Rebrand / Turnaround

Can Desire recover before Trust?

ViMobile service providersAug ’25 → Aug ’26

Between Aug ’25 and Aug ’26, Vi’s Buying Intent rose from 67.8 to 121.3 and its Brand Desire from 45.8 to 154.2. Over the same year, its Brand Trust fell from 88.5 to 63.8.

What caught our attention

Vi has spent the past year working to change how consumers see it — a challenger brand in the middle of a turnaround.

A brand reset is usually judged on one headline number. We wanted to see whether the consumer measures underneath it were moving together, or apart.

What BII shows

Buying Intent

Buying Intent: 67.8 to 121.3, Aug ’25 to Aug ’26.

Brand Desire

Brand Desire: 45.8 to 154.2, Aug ’25 to Aug ’26.

Brand Trust

Brand Trust: 88.5 to 63.8, Aug ’25 to Aug ’26.

What sits underneath

Buying Intent is consumers’ keenness to buy. Brand Desire is how much they want the brand; Brand Trust is how far they rely on it.

For Vi, the two supporting measures went in opposite directions over the same twelve months. Brand Desire rose from 45.8 to 154.2; Brand Trust moved down from 88.5 to 63.8. Buying Intent rose alongside Desire rather than Trust.

Why this matters

A recovery rarely shows up on every measure at once. Wanting a brand again can return quickly; relying on it may take longer, because trust tends to be rebuilt through experience.

If Desire runs well ahead of Trust for a long stretch, the gain in keenness to buy could prove fragile. That is why the distance between the two measures may matter as much as the headline.

What we would watch next

BII reads every brand every month, so each of these can be followed as it develops.

  • Whether Brand Trust steadies, or keeps falling while Desire holds.
  • Whether Buying Intent holds its Aug ’26 level once attention around the turnaround fades.
  • Whether the distance between Brand Desire and Brand Trust narrows month by month.

How BII can be used this way

Rebrand and turnaround tracking

When a brand relaunches, repositions or works to recover, BII separates wanting the brand from relying on it — showing whether Brand Desire, Brand Trust and Buying Intent are moving together, and which one is lagging.

Read every month, it shows whether a turnaround is broadening across measures or resting on one of them.

See the six ways brands use BII

Method and caveats

Period
Aug ’25 compared with Aug ’26.
Category
Mobile service providers.
Scope
BII’s monthly national reading across the 16 cities it covers.
Reading
Figures are BII index readings as published. They describe what moved, not why. Several things happened around Vi during this period, and BII does not attribute the movement to any one of them.

Independent BII analyses. Brands featured are selected because we find the market development noteworthy; inclusion does not imply a client relationship.

What would BII show underneath your brand?

The same monthly readings — Buying Intent, Brand Trust and Brand Desire — for your brand, its category and its competitors.

More brand reads

  • Buying Intent · Aug ’25 → Aug ’26

    Buying Intent: 218.3 to 816.2, Aug ’25 to Aug ’26.

    +274% YoY

    Category rank
    #3 to #3
    Distance to #2, Aug ’26
    Only 4.8% behind

    The rank did not change. The competitive distance did. Rank alone can conceal a major movement in brand strength.

  • Category Buying Intent share · Aug ’25 → Aug ’26

    Category Buying Intent share: 69.1% to 61.3%, Aug ’25 to Aug ’26.

    −11% YoY

    Brand Trust
    minus 13% YoY
    Brand Desire
    minus 27% YoY
    Category position
    Still #1

    Leadership can remain intact even while the consumer pull supporting that leadership begins to weaken.